Confecção de próteses totais removíveis

método digital e método convencional

Autores

  • Lara Souza Barbosa UFES
  • Matheus Paneto Gonçalves UFES
  • Valéria da Penha Freitas UFES
  • Ana Paula Camatta do Nascimento UFES
  • Daphne Camara Barcellos
  • Jackeline Coutinho Guimarães UFES

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59483/rfpp.v4n4125

Palavras-chave:

Odontologia, Prótese total, reablitação

Resumo

Objetivo: Comparar os métodos digital e convencional para a confecção de próteses totais removíveis, avaliando características relacionadas às propriedades mecânicas, tempo clínico, custo, satisfação e conforto do paciente. Materiais e métodos: Foi realizada busca nas bases de dados eletrônicas PubMed, BVS e Scielo, com as palavras-chave: “Computer-Aided Design” AND “Complete Denture” AND “Conventional Impressions”. Após leitura completa dos artigos selecionados, realizou-se as análises comparativas entre os dois métodos. Resultados: As informações coletadas apontaram resultados favoráveis para o método digital no que se refere à adaptação, estabilidade, lisura superficial e resistência à fratura das próteses totais removíveis. O manchamento foi uma característica que se apresentou semelhante nos dois métodos. Conclusão: A aplicação do método digital para confecção das próteses totais removíveis pareceu ser compatível para se alcançar os requisitos adequados em uma prótese total removível com menor tempo clínico.

Referências

AL-DWAIRI, Z. N. et al. A Comparison of the Flexural and Impact Strengths and Flexural Modulus of CAD/CAM and Conventional Heat-Cured Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA). J Prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, v. 29, n. 4, p. 341 – 349, 2020.

AL-FOUZAN, A. F.; AL-MEJRAD, L. A.; ALBARRAG, A. M. Adherence of Candida to complete denture surfaces in vitro: A comparison of conventional and CAD/CAM complete dentures. The journal of advanced prosthodontics, v. 9, n. 5, p. 402 – 408, 2017.

AL-QARNI, F. D. et al. Stainability of acrylic resin materials used in CAD-CAM and conventional complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent, v. 123, n. 6, p. 880 – 887, 2020.

ALHELAL, A. et al. Comparison of retention between maxillary milled and conventional denture bases: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent, v. 117, n. 2, p. 233- 238, 2016.

ALP, G.; JOHNSTON, W. M.; YILMAZ, B. Optical properties and surface roughness of prepolymerized poly(methyl methacrylate) denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent, v. 121, p. 347 – 352, 2018.

ALRUMAIH, H. S. et al. Effects of denture adhesive on the retention of milled and heat-activated maxillary denture bases: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent, v. 120, p. 361 – 366, 2018.

ARAKAWA, I. et al. Clinical outcomes and costs of conventional and digital complete dentures in a university clinic: A retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent, v. 128, n. 3, p. 390 – 395, 2022.

ARSLAN, M. et al. Evaluation of flexural strength and surface properties of prepolymerized CAD/CAM PMMA-based polymers used for digital 3D complete dentures. Int J Comp Dent, v. 21, n. 1 p. 31 – 40, 2018.

AYMAN, A. The residual monomer content and mechanical properties of CADCAM resins used in the fabrication of complete dentures as compared to heat cured resins. Electron Physician, v. 9, p. 4766 – 4772, 2017.

BABA, N. Z. et al. CAD/CAM Complete Denture Systems and Physical Properties: A Review of the Literature. J of Prosthodontics, v. 30, n. S2, p. 113 – 124, Maio 2021. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary:wiley:com/doi/abs/10:1111/jopr:13243.

BETTENCOURT, A. F. et al. Biodegradation of acrylic based resins: A review. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, v. 26, p. e171 – 80, 2010.

BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. SB Brasil 2010: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde Bucal: resultados principais. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde Bucal, Brasília, 2012.

CHEBIB, N. et al. Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part II e conventional impressions versus digital scans: A clinical controlled crossover study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 131, n. 4, p. 618 – 625, 2024.

CLARK, W. A. et al. A Comparison of Conventionally Versus Digitally Fabricated Denture Outcomes in a University Dental Clinic. J Prosthodontics, v. 30, n. 1, p. 47 – 50, 2020.

PESQUISA Nacional de Saúde Bucal SB Brasil 2020, resultados preliminares. 2022. Slides. Disponível em: https://egestorab:saude:gov:br/image/?file= 20221216_I_mod2resultadospreliminaresBrasiliamonsitecompressed_288277690346345359:pdf.Acesso em: 15/06/2024.

GAWALI, N. et al. The Evolution of Digital Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, v. 20, n. 20, Abril 2024.

GENDREAU, L.; LOEWY, Z. G. Epidemiology and etiology of denture stomatitis. Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, v. 20, p. 251 – 60, 2011.

KATTADIYIL, M. T. et al. Comparison of treatment outcomes in digital and conventional complete removable dental prosthesis fabrications in a predoctoral setting. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, v. 114, p. 818 – 25, 2015.

MANIEWICZ, S. et al. Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part I – Conventional versus CAD-CAM methods: A clinical controlled crossover study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 131, n. 4, p. 611 – 617, 2022.

MEDINA, M. et al. Odontologia Digital - Abordagem Histórica e Conceitual: Uma Revisão De Literatura. Revista Científica do CRO-RJ, v. 7, n. 2, p. 9 – 14, 2022.

MUBARAKI, M. Q. et al. Assessment of Conventionally and Digitally Fabricated Complete Dentures: A Comprehensive Review. Materials, v. 15, n. 11, 2022.

MURAT, S. et al. In Vitro Evaluation of Adhesion of Candida albicans on CAD/CAM PMMA-Based Polymers. Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, v. 28, p. e873 – e879, 7 2018.

Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Global oral health status report: towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030. Genebra, 2022. Disponível em: https://www:who:int/publications/i/item/9789240061484. Acesso em: 15/06/2024.

PACQUET, W. et al. Mechanical Properties of CAD/CAM Denture Base Resins. Int J Prosthodont, v. 32, p. 104 – 106, 2019.

PIETROKOVSKI, Y.; PILO, R.; SHMIDT, A. Materials and technologies for fabricating denture bases. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993), v. 27, n. 4, p. 15 – 23, 2010.

SAPONARO, P. C. et al. Evaluation of patient experience and satisfaction with CAD-CAM-fabricated complete dentures: A retrospective survey study. J Prosthet Dent, v. 116, n. 4, p. 524 – 528, 2016.

SINGH, R. D. et al. High performance liquid chromatographic determination of residual monomer released from heat-cured acrylic resin. An in vivo study. J Prosthodont, v. 22, n. 5. p. 358-61, 2013.

SMITH, P. B.; PERRY, J.; ELZA, W. Economic and Clinical Impact of Digitally Produced Dentures. J Prosthodont, v. 30, p. 108 – 112, 2020.

SRINIVASAN, M. et al. CAD/CAM milled removable complete dentures: time and cost estimation study. J Dent, v. 80, p. 75 – 79, 9 2019.

STEINMASSL, O. et al. CAD/CAM produces dentures with improved fit. Clinical oral investigations, v. 22, p. 2829 – 2835, 2018.

STEINMASSL, P. et al. Do CAD/CAM dentures really release less monomer than conventional dentures? Clinical oral investigations, v. 21, p. 1697 – 1705, 2016.

TASAKA, A. et al. Accuracy and retention of denture base fabricated by heat curing and additive manufacturing. J Prosthodontic Res, v. 63, n. 1, p. 85-89, 2019.

TECHAPIROONTONG, S. et al. Workflows and Laboratory Cost for Removable Digital Complete Denture: Two Case Reports with and without Existing Denture. Case Rep Dent, p. 1 – 8, 2024.

YUZBASIOGLU, E. et al. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health, v. 14, p. 10, 2014.

Downloads

Publicado

12-12-2024

Como Citar

1.
Souza Barbosa L, Paneto Gonçalves M, Freitas V da P, Camatta do Nascimento AP, Camara Barcellos D, Coutinho Guimarães J. Confecção de próteses totais removíveis: método digital e método convencional. RFPP [Internet]. 12º de dezembro de 2024 [citado 21º de dezembro de 2024];4(4). Disponível em: https://revistadeodontologia.facpp.edu.br/index.php/rfpp/article/view/125

Edição

v. 4 n. 4 (2024)

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Copyright (c) 2024 Licença Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Esta licença permite que outros remixem, ajustem e desenvolvam seu trabalho de forma não comercial, desde que creditem a autoria e licenciem suas novas criações sob os mesmos termos.

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Esta licença permite que outros remixem, ajustem e desenvolvam seu trabalho de forma não comercial, desde que creditem a autoria e licenciem suas novas criações sob os mesmos termos.